The ideas for upgrades thread.

[Halakbalakbalak]

It has been long debated about wwz having unit upgrades... well here it will be debated oucne and for all.. I myself would like a few upgrades.. maybee a hollow tipped bullet upgrade that makes mgs to more damage(maybee jsut plus 1 ) But hey a problem can't be solves or though of a way to solve it by 1 person.. then again it can't be done by everyone sometimes.. so lets see if most poeple can keep the ideas balenced yet refined and usefull.

[DashBake]

Would be quiet unbalanced due to upgrades such as health upgrades for humans and Cherry Pie bullets which can increase dmg to 4...
Zombies would also be quiet unblanaced im saying this because if zombies get upgrades (due to evolving vires) they can get harder punch(due to rigamortius if they still get that)

[Magura]

Nah.

[TheRussianLord]

Sounds interesting. However to keep with realism the upgrades would have to cost more, the more of the unit you have. So actually the upgrade would simply come down to new and more expensive variants of each existing unit. Those that have played Rise of Nations should understand this quite well. It would be complex but possible.

[Halakbalakbalak]

Ive played rise of nations... could make a triggor to auto upgrade the units you have when you get the upgrade >>.

[KoreanAnger]

I'm not too big fan of that idea. There are ways to juke the system, such as by letting your army die in order to lower the cost of the upgrade. I think a better idea would be the ability to individually upgrade units, this would I think make the game a little bit more fun for the "lesser powers". I mean if its just bulk resources to upgrade bulk amounts of units, as usual countries like Russia and UK will be able to have all the fun. While countries like Italy and Yugoslavia won't be able to grab too many cities and as a result will only be able to muster a force group or two of units. But since they have less units to worry about they would benefit more from the individually upgraded units more (hypothetically because they'll be able to manage them better) as opposed to bigger countries like Russia which have more territory and more units to worry about. This is all based on my observation that bigger powers tend to lose units more, while countries like Germany tend to keep their units alive longer. If this seemed a bit dense or convulated I'd be more than happy to clarify some of my points, thanks.

[Halakbalakbalak]

Korean.... you don't seem to know much of what your saying... If you have to upgrade units individualy then you would be spending 3 times more then what you would normaly... and as for gettign rid of units.... just make a disband button that gives you 70 percent of what you payed back. Also ugoslavia can easily get over 30 income getting past the 24 or so income uk gets.. russia will almost always end out with 70 sweden about the same as russia turkey atleast 3or so spain has like about 20 france is about 30 i think german is about 30... so all of the countries can muster a huge force in less then 5 minutes.

[TheRussianLord]

Korean you misunderstood. Letting your army die would indeed decrease the cost of the upgrade, but building the upgraded unit would also cost more. You would save yourself nothing. Halak I'm not sure how your reply was even relevant.