![]() | |
| | #1 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Hopkinsville
Posts: 24
![]() | whays 1.0 > .79? i personnaly say .79 is better i mean i just like it more 1.00 is major rigged with its creeps and evrything Plz Respond ty ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #2 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Seven blocks down from your drug dealer
Posts: 2,672
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: whays 1.0 > .79? 1.00 was meant to be rigged because VG wanted to destroy the maps reputation BECAUSE he was leaving the team to do his own map that ended up being worse then a newly created map in WE that has no edits. |
| | |
| | #3 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,992
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: whays 1.0 > .79? Actually I don't think vg was trying to rig the map and even tried to make it more balanced than .79. Which really reflexs on vg's actual skills with the WE. |
| | |
| | #4 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Underground
Posts: 5,865
![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: whays 1.0 > .79? reflects* anyways, .79 is real, so it>1.00 ![]() ![]() And now, directly from chip's signature... ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Denmark (GMT+1)
Posts: 2,173
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: whays 1.0 > .79? Lol so he TRIED to make Ultf lesser rigged, but ended up even more rigged due to his limited knowledge on WE? Wow irony is a bitch. |
| | |
| | #6 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Seven blocks down from your drug dealer
Posts: 2,672
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: whays 1.0 > .79? No, actually VG tried killing the map to get people to his new one.. pretty sure I've seen him say it ( most likely on msn ) long ago when this was the big deal.. |
| | |
| | #7 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Your Mom
Posts: 2,241
![]() | Re: whays 1.0 > .79? Any WarCraft player should know not to trust version numbers? |
| | |
| | #8 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,514
![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: whays 1.0 > .79? Lol, wth, no, I like dota 98543598435.554543 |
| | |
| | #9 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Hopkinsville
Posts: 24
![]() | Re: whays 1.0 > .79? DoTa is gay i alwyas get kicked casuse ima noob |
| | |
| | #10 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Underground
Posts: 5,865
![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: whays 1.0 > .79? wasn't this a ultf topic? ![]() ![]() And now, directly from chip's signature... ![]() |
| | |
| | #11 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,514
![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: whays 1.0 > .79? Gay people are a part of the world. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New member, 1.0? | Cigil | Ultimate Footmen | 3 | 05-29-2008 05:22 PM |
| ultimate footmen 1.0 is a discrace | luigi_fan64 | Ultimate Footmen | 37 | 08-16-2007 08:02 PM |
| Gold Code in Footman .79 | tribunis | WarCraft Talk | 4 | 07-28-2007 12:17 PM |
| Ultimate Footmen 1.00 vs .79 | Mox_Demon | Ultimate Footmen | 6 | 06-07-2007 04:49 PM |
| Ultimate Footmen .79 | I really dislike 79 | Ultimate Footmen | 36 | 12-22-2006 03:48 PM |